Learning Center
We keep you up to date on the latest tax changes and news in the industry.

Attorney's Unprecedented Suit: Can a Dog Be a Tax Dependent?

Pet owners intimately understand the financial commitment of care for their furry companions, from vet visits and grooming to specialized diets. Many have jokingly considered these expenses enough to deem their pets as dependents. Surprisingly, one attorney is moving beyond jest to present this argument in federal court.

In December 2025, New York attorney Amanda Reynolds initiated a groundbreaking lawsuit against the IRS, advocating for the recognition of her eight-year-old golden retriever, Finnegan, as a tax-dependent. This case, while seemingly whimsical, captures a question many ponder: Could any pet-related expenses gain tax deductions? If not, why exactly?

The intricate details of this case reveal what the tax code states and where there are narrow possibilities for animal-related tax benefits.

Image 1

Legal Battle: Asserting Canine Dependency

Reynolds contends that Finnegan meets IRS-dependent criteria by virtue of:

  • living with her exclusively,

  • lacking personal income, and

  • her provision of over half his annual support costs, exceeding $5,000 for essentials like food and medical care.

A national news report quoting Reynolds insists, "Finnegan fills a child-like role in my life and qualifies as a 'dependent.'" Moreover, equality arguments arise, highlighting species as an unfair criterion and the lack of tax acknowledgment as a Fifth Amendment "taking" issue.

Current Status of the Case

Situated in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, this case is temporarily halted while the IRS readies a dismissal motion.

In a court order, the judge notes it poses a "novel yet pressing" question of whether pets could be "dependents" under tax law. However, the court acknowledges formidable challenges, stating the claims appear "on their face, not meritorious" and may not withstand dismissal.

Image 2

In essence, although this lawsuit resonates widely, skepticism prevails on its court success.

Why Federal Tax Law Excludes Pets as Dependents

The legal setback stems from tax law defining "dependent" as an “individual.”

According to Internal Revenue Code Section 152, dependents fall under "qualifying child" or "qualifying relative" categories, terms historically linked to humans.

Hence, IRS mechanisms for listing a pet as a dependent do not exist. Instead, dependent-related tax benefits are intertwined with family or household human relationships, evidenced by required Social Security or taxpayer ID numbers.

Call Today
We solve tax problems for individuals and help tax pros solve tax problems for their clients.
Contact Us

Reynolds argues Finnegan passes the functional dependency test (no income, resides with her, she's his supporter), but the federal framework is not designed to classify animals as "individual" dependents.

Existing Animal Tax Benefits

Though typical pet expenses clamp tax deductions, notable exceptions apply, an insight your audience will find valuable for practical tax advice.

1) Medical Expenses for Service Animals

Service animals trained for disability assistance can count as medical expenses within itemized deductions.

In IRS guidance, deductibles require itemization and must surmount the AGI threshold. Costs for acquiring, training, and sustaining a service animal qualify as medical expenses when tied to medical care.

Nuance Alert: Emotional support animals typically lack service animal federal status, differing in disability-related task training.

Image 3

2) Business Expense Deductions for Work Animals

Occasionally, animals serve in bona fide business roles, such as:

  • a guard dog protecting commercial premises,

  • work animals engaged in pest control.

In these contexts, enduring costs could be ordinary and necessary business expenses. Proper documentation and authentic business purposes are essential.

Tax references highlight this as a stringent category for animal-related IRS tax leeway.

3) Charitable Deductions for Foster Animals

Individuals fostering animals for qualifying agencies might deduct certain unreimbursed costs as charitable contributions—requiring strict adherence to rules and thorough documentation.

Taxpayers' Takeaway

This suit sings an emotional melody: pets symbolically comprise family for millions, and related expenses are undeniably substantial. Yet, tax statutes prioritize statutory definitions over sentiment.

For now:

  • Listing pets as dependents remains prohibited on federal returns.

  • Typical pet expenses (food, grooming, veterinary care for ordinary pets) remain personal and non-deductible.

  • Niche animal-related deductions are limited to specific situations—service animals, legitimate business-related animals, and, sometimes, foster-related charitable costs.

As Reynolds's case proceeds, it's pivotal not because experts anticipate IRS issuance of dependent IDs for pets, but because it sheds light on how many families emotionally and financially cherish pets, contrasting sharply with tax laws dividing "family" from "property."

Finally, remember: before assuming deductibility, it’s imperative to verify IRS guidelines distinguishing recognized deductions from ignored claims.

Call Today
We solve tax problems for individuals and help tax pros solve tax problems for their clients.
Contact Us
Share this article...

Want tax & accounting tips and insights?

Sign up for our newsletter.

I confirm this is a service inquiry and not an advertising message or solicitation. By clicking “Submit”, I acknowledge and agree to the creation of an account and to the and .
IRS Tax Pros Ask Us A Question
Welcome To IRS Tax Pros Ai - Your smart assistant.
Please fill out the form and our team will get back to you shortly The form was sent successfully